Assignment No. 2

Review Article

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

GEN732 – ADVANCED CYTOGENETICS

I.D:ms170200295       Muhammad Shakeel Nasir     M.S Genetics             

 

Application of advanced Cytogenetics techniques in Plants

 

Abstarct

The occasions that have prompted the improvement of cytogenetics as
a claim to fame inside the life sciences aredescribed, with uncommon
thoughtfulness regarding the early history of human cytogenetics. Changes in
the determination of chromosome investigation has taken after nearly the presentation
of creative innovation. The survey gives a concise record of the structure of physical
and meiotic chromosomes, focusing on the high protection of structure in plants
and creatures, with accentuation on viewpoints that require additionally
examine. The eventual fate of sub-atomic cytogenetics is probably going to rely
upon a superior learning of chromosome structure and capacity.

To a great extent through misuse of crossover life, grain yields of
a few oat crops were considerably increased.cytogenetic controls, demonstrated
valuable in moving qualities for protection from sicknesses and creepy crawly
bugs from reasonable outsider contributors into edit cultivars. Plant change
has been additionally quickened by biotechnological instruments of quality exchange,
to build new attributes into plants The effective sending of transgenic ways to
deal with battle creepy crawly bugs and illnesses of imperative yields like
rice,wheat,maize.

 

 

Introduction

Before the 1920s, cytological examinations were completed on
organic tissues that were installed in paraffin, segmented, and recolored (1).They
only encouraged the assurance of chromosome numbers and allowed location of
rough size contrasts among the chromosomes in substantial and meiotic cells of
numerous eukaryotic species. For instance, in the class Triticum, Sakamura
(1918) demonstrated that the substantial cells of the species monococcum,
turgidum, and aestivum had 14, 28, and 42 comparative estimated chromosomes,
separately.

The events that 1930s developments were presented which encouraged
cytological and karyo typic examinations. In 1921, Belling depicted a system
for examining meiosis in plant species that included the squashing of anthers.
This strategy allowed the partition of PMCs and encouraged the spreading of
their chromosomes. In 1929, Kagawa, working with Triticum and Aegilops species,
exhibited that treatment with chloral hydrate before settling and recoloring
the phones abbreviated the chromosomes Pretreatment with different operators, for
example, alpha bromonaphthalene (2), colchicine (3),and icy water (4) likewise
allowed ID of these chromosomal substructures.

Research Work

By the mid 1940s the squashing procedure, accompanying with
suitable changes and pre_treatment, totally supplanted the strategy for
microtome separating of tissues in chromosome ponders utilizing substantial and
meiotic tissues of most species ).The squash method, with fitting alterations,
was likewise utilized effectively in chromosome investigations of bugs, creatures
of land and water, and different creatures (5), barring warm blooded animals
(6). Mammalian cytology needed to anticipate the advancements of hypotonic
arrangements (6), in vitro refined of tissues and cells (6), and their
colchicine pretreatment (6) for acquiring good.In 1944 it was understood that
hereditary change in microbes was because of DNA and not protein and that DNA
was the atom in charge of heredity in qualities and chromosomes (8).

The atomic structure of DNA turned into a key inquiry. Chargaff
appeared in 1950 that, in DNA, the measure of adenine is equivalent to the
measure of thymine and that the measure of guanine is equivalent to the measure
of cytosine (9). This was the vital intimation to the structure of the DNA
twofold helix demonstrated by Watson,what’s more, Crick in 1953, and in light
of the X-beam diffraction investigations of Rosalind Franklin (10). Around
eight years after the fact it was found that triplets of the base sets
indicated every amino corrosive in the polypeptide chain of every protein
(11,12). The grouping of base matches in DNA/RNA is hereditary code in all
types of life that slipped from a typical begetter 4.5 billion years
ago.Phylogenomic examines utilizing chromosome painting affirms the high
preservation of DNA between even indirectly related species (13).

Chromosome structure

Since the hereditary code was deciphered much has been learnt about
the chromosome structure shared by all living beings from yeast to human.
Substantially more stays to be found. One of the motivations behind this audit
is to support look into chromosome structure as this could help progress atomic
cytogenetics.

We now perceive that, following DNA replication, the metaphase
chromosome comprises of two chromatids held together by a centromere and by
cohesin. Every chromatid is a solitary atom of DNA appended to protein lattice
strands that structures its framework or pivotal fiber 14. More than 200
unique proteins are related with chromatin 15.Electron microscopy uncovers
that the SC has a comparable structure in all plant and creature species that
deliver germ cells 20,21.

Standard somatic karyotypes in plant species

In plant species, for example, maize (22), tomato(24) and rice (44)
the individual chromosomes couldn’t be recognized in substantial cells
utilizing standard stressing systems in light of the fact that the chromosomes
were either too little as well as comparative in morphology. In the greater
part of the plant species, be that as it may, no less than a couple of the
chromosomes and trisomics could be recognized in standard substantial
karyotypes.

Chromosome distinguishing proof during meiosis

Standard recoloring strategies render nucleoli to be plainly
obvious at pachytene stage and allow the identification of chromosomes that
convey NORs.Moreover, in corn (25), tomato (26), and rice (27) it is
conceivable to distinguish each univalent, bivalent, and multivalent
relationship based on its length and chromomere design amid pachytene.
Subsequently a chromosome in triplicate in these species is effectively
distinguished by examination of the trivalent design at pachytene utilizing
standard recoloring procedures.

Banding procedures

A comprehensive investigation of the karyotype requires the
utilization of recoloring techniques that can uncover every chromosome as a
particular, extraordinary, and consistent example of rotating dull and light
banding districts, topologically proportionate to the groups in the polytene
chromosomes in salivary organ cells of D. melanogaster.

Q_banding

one of a kind examples of brilliantly fluorescent districts
exchanging with nonfluorescent (dull) areas were created in each
chromosome.Weisblum and de Haseth (1972) and Burkholder (1988)(28) have
demonstrated that fluorescent colors interface with AT base sets and those
locales of DNA that are adequately AT_rich (70– 100 %) fluoresce and

 show up as brilliant groups.
In Scilla sibirica every one of the eight chromosome sets can be recognized
(27). Q_banding does not require any pretreatment and is the least difficult of
all the bandingmethods.In plants, Q_banding contemplates have been restricted
to a couple in Trillium, Scilla,Allium, Crepis, Lilium, Secale, and Vicia (29)

 

G Banding

In spite of the fact that the method has been endeavored in many
plant species, G_bands have been created in the chromosomes of just a couple of
animal varieties: Tulipa gesneriana (30), Pinus resinosa (31), The inability to
deliver G groups in the chromosomes of most plant species, incorporating those
in the Triticeae, has been ascribed to the expanded buildup of the plant
chromosomes (31).

R Banding

R_bands have been identified in just a couple of plant animal
varieties e.g., S. sibirica, V. fava, Allium spp., none of which have a place
with the Tririceae clan (33). In addition, since the R_bands in these species
are very few and swoon in expression,they have not been utilized for
karyotyping and cytogenetic studies.R_bands can be delivered by GC_specific
fluorochromes (33)

Sub-atomic Marker Maps

Broad maps comprising of 1000 RFLP markers were produced in wheat
(32). These markers were portrayed as excessively costly and bulky for
application, making it impossible to marker helped choice however assumed a
critical part in revealing connections between various grass genomes (32).
Other atomic maps were created with PCR_based markers including RAPDs (William
et al., 1990)

FISH and GISH examination

Another class of strategies that encourage the distinguishing proof
of particular genomes, singular chromosomes or chromosomal sections is the
utilization of fluorescent signs. The main methodology to utilize fluorescent
names to recognize plant chromosomes was the procedure of genomic in situ
hybridization (33). This system was then used to recognize parental genomes and
genome association, in addition to outsider genome/chromosome introgression
(36). The distinguishing proof of the three genomes of hexaploid wheat has been
accomplished, yet ended up being hard to rehash reliably (34). An adjustment of
the multicolour GISH system (35)allowed the unequivocal distinguishing proof of
every one of the three wheat genomes in addition to the nearness of outsider chromosomes
and translocations.the distinguishing proof of the A, B and D genomes of normal
wheat utilizing GISH had been accounted for by Mukai et al. 5 and
Sanchez-Moran et al. 6.

Extra instruments that supplement the utilization of FISH
innovation for cytogenetic examination of individual chromosomes are 25S
qualities plus.BAC clones that can be differentially recolored to recognize
singular chromosomes (37). The fiber FISH strategy, utilizing suitable tests
which is connected to extended physical chromatin can give better determination
of geneand rehashed grouping plans on wheat and bareley chromosomes (38).
Another current improvement is the utilization of rice succession data for fine
mapping in wheat,barley and maize. By and large the colinearity

By joining these FISH milestones with other chromosomal characters,
for example, arm proportion and heterochromatic districts, exact karyotyping
has been accounted for the cytologically very much portrayed KYS innate line of
maize (40) and for chose lily species (41)GISH has likewise been utilized to
advise on the genome constitution of common mixtures, now and then in mix with
FISH to recognize the parental inception of particular loci.

Fiber FISH

After the acquaintance of the fiber FISH with plant species 42,
FISH and GISH have made a commitment to our comprehension of early advancement
of as of late framed polyploid types of Tragopogon and Spartina. Two
allotetraploid types of Tragopogon emerged in the mid 1900s in North America,
following the presentation of three diploid (2n = 2x = 12) species from Europe
35.

Discussion and Conclusions

The current advancements in cytogenetics portrayed above will give
new instruments to the investigation of plant genomes. These strategies permit
the investigation of the fine points of interest of chromosome structure and
will allow advanced examinations of chromosomal conduct. As more genomes move
toward becoming sequenced, instruments to examine chromosomal association and
conduct will assume a more noteworthy part in researching the capacity of those
genomes FISH and GISH together have revealed much insight into numerous organic
marvels. Quite compelling to this audit are their parts in enhancing our
comprehension of interspecific hybridisation and  polyploidy, phylogenetic connections, hereditary
mapping and plant rearin.Late advancements that enhance our capacity to
recognize marginally separated genomes from each other, and to recognize each
of the nonhomologous chromosomes inside a genome, add another measurement to
the investigation of plant genomics. Contrasts in redundant arrangements among
various species have been utilized to create multicolor fluorescent in situ
hybridization strategies that can characterize the segments of allopolyploids
in detail and uncover introgression between species.cytogenetics will be a
great horizon of progress in in coming days because we can change genetic set
up of an organisim and can produce a large number of new varieties of plants
and  method of best growing.There are
many plants diseases which cause loss of a large quntity of crops every year
and  cause economical loss .Cytogenetics
can create a great advances in study of chromosomes nature and can make new
genetics combination.there are many methods to identified the chromosomes

 

 

 

References

 1Wilson E.R. 1925. The Cell in Development and Heredity. Macmillan
Publishing Co. New York 

 2.Schmuck A., Kostoff D. 1939. Bromo_acenaphthaline and bromonaphthaline as agents inducing
chromosome doubling    in rye and wheat.
C.R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci URSS. 23:263–266.

3. O’Mara J.G. 1939.
Observations on the immediate effect of colchicine. J. Hered. 30:35–37.

4. Hill R.D., Myers W.M. 1945.
A schedule including cold treatment to facilitate somatic chromosome counts in
certain forage grasses. Stain Tech. 20:89–92.

5.White M.J.D. 1954. Animal
Cytology and EvoIution. Cambridge University Press.Hsu I.C. 1979.
Human and Mammalian Cytogenetics. An Historical Perspective.
Springer_Verlag, Heidelberg.

6.Hsu T.C., Pomerat C.M. 1953.
Mammalian chromosomes in vivo II. A method for spreading the chromo_

somes of cells in tissue. J. Hered. 44:23–29.

8. Avery OT, Macleod CM, McCarty M. Studies in the chemical nature
of the

substance inducing transformation in pneumococcal types. J Exp Med.

1944;79:137–58.

9. Chargaff E, Zamenhof S, Green C. Composition of human
deoxypentosenucleic acid. Nature.1950;165:756–7547.

10. Watson JD, Crick FHC. Molecular structure of nucleic acids.
Nature.1953;171:737–8.

11. Crick FHC, Barnett L, Brenner S, Watts-Tobin RJ. General nature
of the code for proteins. Nature. 1961;192:227–32.

12. Nirenberg MW, Mathaei HJ. The dependence of cell-free protein
synthesis in E.coli upon naturally occurring or synthetic polynucleotides.Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1961;47:1588–602.

13. Kasai F, O’Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA. Extensive homology of
chicken macrochromosomes in the karyotypes of Trachemys scripta elegans and
Crocodilus niloticus revealed by chromosome painting despite long divergence
times. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2012;136:303–7.

14. Paulson JR, Laemmli UK. The structure of histone-depleted
metaphase

chromosomes. Cell. 1977;12:817–28.

15. Fukui K. Structural analysis of chromosomes and their
constituent proteins.

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009;124:215–27.

20. Westergaard M, von Wettstein D. The synaptinemal complex.

Annu Rev Genet. 1972;6:71–110.

21. Moses MJ, Counce SJ, Paulson DF. Synaptonemal complex
complement of

man in spreads of spermatocytes, with details of the sex chromosome
pair.

Science. 1975;187:363–5.

22.Rhoades M.M., McClintock B. 1935.
The cytogenetics of maize. Bot. Rev. 1:292–325.

23.Rick C.M., Barton W. 1954.
Cytological and genetical identification of the primary trisomics of the
tomato.Genetics 39:640–

25.Roder M.S., Korzun V., Wendehake K., Plaschke J.Tixier M.H.,
Lero, P., Ganal M.W. 1998. A
microsatel_

lite map of wheat. Genetics 149:2007–2023

26.Rick C.M., Barton W. 1954.
Cytological and genetical identification of the primary trisomics of the tomato.Genetics
39:640–666.

27.Khush G.S., Singh R.J., Sur S.C., Libro A.L. 1984.Primary trisomies of rice: Origin, morphology, cytology, and
use in linkage mapping. Genetics 107: 141–163.

28.Weisblum B., de Haseth P.L. 1972.
Quinacrine a chromosome stain specific for deoxyadenylate_deo_

xythymidylate rich regions in DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 69:629–632.

29.Caspersson T., Zech L., Modest E.J., Foley G.E., Wagh
U.,Simonsson E. 1969.
DNA_binding fluorochromes for

the study of the organization of the metaphase nucleus.Exp. Cell
Res. 58:141–152.

30.Filion W.G., Blakey D.H. 1979.
Differential Giemsa staining in plants VI. Centromeric banding. Can. J.

Genet. Cytol. 21:373–378.

31.Greilhuber J. 1977.
Why plant chromosomes do not show G_bands. Theor. Appl. Genet. 50:121–124.

Schweizer D. 1976. Reverse
fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma

58: 307–324.

32.Gale M.D, Atkinson M.D., Chinoy C.N., Harcourt R.L., Jia J., Li
Q.Y., Devos K.M. 1995. Genetic
maps of hexa_

ploid wheat. Proceedings of 8th International Wheat Genetics
Symposium, pp29–40 Li, ZS, Xin, ZY (eds).

China Agricultural Scientech Press, Beijing

33.Shwarzacher T., Leitch A.R., Bennett M.D., Heslop_ Harrison J.S.
1989. In situ hybridization of parental genomes in a wide hybrid.
Ann. Botany 64; 315–324.

34.Mukai Y., Nakahara Y., Yamamoto 1993. Simulta_ neous discrimination of the three genomes of
hexaploid wheat by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization using total
genomic and highly repeated DNA as probes. Genome 36:489–494

35.Han F., Liu B., Fedak G., Liu Z. 2004. Genomic constitution and variation in five partial
amphiploids of wheat – Thinopyrum intermedium as revealed by GISH,
multicolor GISH and seed storage protein analysis.Theor. Appl. Genet. 109:1070–1076

36.Jiang J., Gill B.S. 1994.
Different species specific chromosome translocations in Triticum timopheevi and
T.turgidum support the diphyletic origin of polyploid wheats. Chromosome
Res. 2:59–64

37.Zhang P., Li W.L., Fellers J., Freibe B., Gill B.S. 2004. BAC_FISH in wheat identifies chromosome landmarks

consisting of different types of transposable elements.Chromosoma 12:288–299.

38.Valanick M., Bartos J., Kovarova P., Kubalakova M., de Jong
J.H., Dolezel J. 2004. High
revolution FISH on

super stretched flow sorted plant chromosomes. Plant. J. 37:940–950.

39.Bossolini E., Wickers T., Knober P.A. 2007. Comparison of orthologous loci from small grass genome of Brachypodium
and rice: implications from wheat genomics and grass genome annotation.
Plant J. 49:704–717.

40.Mukai Y, Nakahara Y, Yamamoto M: Simultaneous discrimination of
the three genomes in hexaploid wheat by multicolor fluorescence in situ
hybridization using total genomic and highly repeated DNA as probes.Genome
1993, 36:489-494.

41. Sanchez-Moran E, Benavente E, Orellana J: Simultaneous
identification of A, B, D and R genomes by genomic in situ hybridization in
wheat–rye derivatives. Heredity 1999, 83:249-252

44.. Chen CC, Chen CM, Hsu FC, Wang CJ, Yang JT, Kao YY: The
pachytene chromosomes of maize as revealed by fluorescence in situ
hybridization with repetitive DNA sequences. Theor Appl Genet 2000, 101:30-36.

41. Fransz PF, Alonso-Blanco C, Liharska TB, Peeters AJM, Zabel
P,de Jong HJ: High-resolution physical mapping in Arabidopsis thaliana and
tomato by fluorescence in situ hybridization to extended DNA fibres. Plant J
1996, 9:421-430.

42.Bennett, S.T.; Kenton, A.Y.; Bennett, M.D. Genomic in situ hybridization
reveals the

allopolyploid nature of Milium montianum (Gramineae). Chromosoma
1992, 101, 420-424.

44. Ownbey, M. Natural hybridization and amphiploidy in the genus Tragopogon.
Am. J. Bot. 1950, 37, 487-499.

45. Rieger,
R.; Michaelis, A.; Green, M.M. (1968), A glossary of genetics and
cytogenetics: Classical and molecular, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 9780387076683

46. Levitsky
G.A. 1924. The material basis of heredity. State Publication Office of the
Ukraine, Kiev. in Russian

47. Levitsky
GA (1931). “The morphology of chromosomes”. Bull. Applied Bot.
Genet. Plant Breed. 27: 19–174.

48. Kottler
M. 1974. From 48 to 46: cytological technique, preconception and the counting
of the human chromosomes. Bull. Hist. Med. 48, 465-50

x

Hi!
I'm Eleanor!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out